Lance Miller, et al. v. Columbia Bank f/k/a Umpqua Bank
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 LANCE MILLER, et al., CASE NO. C25-1870JLR 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 12 COLUMBIA BANK f/k/a UMPQUA 13 BANK, 14 Defendant. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 Before the court is Defendant Columbia Bank’s (“Columbia” 1) motion to dismiss. 18 (MTD (Dkt. # 23); Reply (Dkt. # 27); see also Compl.) Plaintiffs Lance Miller and Seth 19 Freeman oppose the motion. (Resp. (Dkt. # 26).) Plaintiffs serve as co-Trustees of the 20 iCap Trust (the “Trust”). (Compl. ¶¶ 15-16.) The Trust was created pursuant to the 21 1 Plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Bly-Magee v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.