Legal Opinion

Warren v. Federal Land Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1924No. 3765PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) We think the learned trial judge erred in dismissing the petition. In our opinion, none of the grounds of the motion presented a valid objection to the action.

We shall consider the last ground of the demurrer first, because process is jurisdictional, and failure to attach process is fatal to any action. The objection here raised is that the plaintiffs failed to pray for process. Without deciding whether it is necessary in any case that there should be a prayer for process, though usually such prayer is inserted in petitions, it is very easy to see that in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Trust & Banking Co. v. BooneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Chew v. Bank of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
  3. Boynton v. ReeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Bryan v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  5. McClure Realty & Investment Co. v. EubanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Morris v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Harrison v. LovettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Fields v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Sewell v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Williford v. SwintSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API