Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Campbell v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1893No. 1116PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Origvndl Application for Prohibition.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

A somewhat cai’eful examination of the voluminous complaint filed in the action, which it is claimed on the part of the relator he is entitled to have transferred to the county of Kitsap for trial, satisfies fis that the substantial object of such suit is to enforce a trust and compel an accounting on the part of the relator in favor of the plaintiffs in said suit. And such being the fact, we are of the opinion that the conten*307tion of the respondents that, by reason of the fact that a portion of the relief sought as a result of the enforcement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. LeBreton v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State ex rel. Cummings v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Bell v. FluddSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888
  5. Briggs v. FrenchU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1833

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State ex rel. Miller v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State ex rel. Martin v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State ex rel. Scougale v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Mills v. District Court of Lincoln CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API