State ex rel. Cummings v. Superior Court
Washington Supreme Court
Original Application for Prohibition.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoyt, J.
The defendant was not served in the county in whieh this action was commenced, nor was he a resident of that county, but, on the contrary, was a bona fide resident of the county of Pierce, in which service of process was made upon him. Such being the case, King county was not the proper county for the trial of the action. It is, however, provided in § 162, Code of Procedure, that such fact shall not prevent a trial of the cause in the county in which the action has been commenced, unless the defendant, at the time he appears and demurs or…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of North Yakima ex rel. Whitson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by15 opinions
- State ex rel. Miller v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. Martin v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Cattlemens Trust Co. of Ft. Worth v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- State v. LambertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
- State ex rel. Wolferman v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.