Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cummings v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1893No. 795PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Original Application for Prohibition.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

The defendant was not served in the county in whieh this action was commenced, nor was he a resident of that county, but, on the contrary, was a bona fide resident of the county of Pierce, in which service of process was made upon him. Such being the case, King county was not the proper county for the trial of the action. It is, however, provided in § 162, Code of Procedure, that such fact shall not prevent a trial of the cause in the county in which the action has been commenced, unless the defendant, at the time he appears and demurs or…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of North Yakima ex rel. Whitson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Miller v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Martin v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Cattlemens Trust Co. of Ft. Worth v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. State v. LambertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. State ex rel. Wolferman v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API