Legal Opinion

Bell v. Fludd

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 28, 1888PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The opinion sufficiently states the case upon the points decided here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice McIver.

The plaintiff, Mrs. Bell, as a judgment creditor of the late John B. Moore, brings this action for the following purposes, as stated by the Circuit Judge: 1st. To have an account of the administration of the estate of said John B. Moore by the defendant, Augustus Fludd, as his executor. 2nd. To have an account from the defendant, Mrs. Anne Peyre Manning, who was the widow of said John B. Moore, of all property and money which came to her under the will of her said former husband. 3rd. To set aside as fraudulent a judgment obtained by…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. McGrath v. Piedmont Mutual Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  2. Nixon & Danforth v. Piedmont Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  3. Ex Parte JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Lillard v. SearsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  5. Litz v. RoweSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API