Legal Opinion

Comstock v. Porter

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1830PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Motion to quash a certiorari. The plaintiff sued out a certiorari to remove a justice’s judgment rendered for the sum of $39 into this court. The certiorari was allowed by a commissioner, without leave having previously been obtained from the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Marcy, J.

In this case a motion was made at the last May term to compel a supreme court commissioner to allow an appeal, which motion was denied. 4 Wend. R. 203. The party had lost his right to an appeal by neglecting to make his affidavit within the time prescribed by the statute. The same officer subsequently allowed a certiorari which this motion seeks to have dismissed. The judgment below exceeds twenty-five dollars, and consequently cannot be reviewed by certiorari by virtue of the statute. The party suing out the writ stands upon his common law rights. He insists that…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Farrell v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Owens v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Tallman v. BigelowNew York Supreme Court · 1833
  4. Niblo v. Post's administratorsNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  5. Davis County v. HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1853

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API