Legal Opinion

Haberly v. Farmers' Mutual Fire Relief Ass'n

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1930Published

1Opinion

Petition for rehearing denied December 30, 1930

On Petition foe Reheaeing

(294 P. 594)

KELLY, J.

In a petition for rehearing we are told that, in its original decision herein, the court ‘ ‘ overlooked and disregarded the plain mandate of statutes relating to variance between pleading and proofs.” These statutes would be applicable if the questions to be decided had reference to the admissibility of testimony or the adequacy of proof. No such questions are presented here. To examine the records of a ease for the purpose of determining such questions, where no objections nor exceptions are taken in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Olds v. Von Der HellenOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Almada v. VandecarOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Haberly v. Farmers' Mutual Fire Relief Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Lebb v. PeabodyOregon Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API