Legal Opinion

Lebb v. Peabody

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Multnomah: J. P. Kavanattgh, Judge. In Banc.

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment rendered in an action to replevin an automobile. The cause was tried without the intervention of a jury. The findings of fact made and the conclusions of law reached by the trial court, and an order labeled “decree,” and the judgment are before us; but none of the evidence received at the trial appears in the record submitted to us. The only questions which we can consider are whether the legal conclusions drawn by the trial court are deducible from the findings of fact, and whether the pleadings and findings of facts are sufficient to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. United States Nat. Bank v. SheflerOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Jeffery v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. La Vie v. CrosbyOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  5. O'Connor v. ToweyOregon Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Finn v. EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Finn v. EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Haberly v. Farmers' Mutual Fire Relief Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Patterson v. Horsefly Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API