Legal Opinion

Olds v. Von Der Hellen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1927PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, C. J.

This is an action to recover the damages resulting from the alleged negligent burning of plaintiff’s building. The defendants named in the complaint were William Von der Hellen, Paul B. Rynning, Polk Smith, Eugene J. Dietz, Charles Par-rent and Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland. The last-named defendant was not served and made no voluntary appearance- in the action. During the trial the action was dismissed as to all of the defendants except William Von der Hellen and Eugene J. Dietz. As against them the court gave plaintiff judgment for $2,500, together with the costs and disbursements…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Home Mutual Insurance v. O. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Furrer v. Yew Creek Logging Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Public Market Co. of Portland v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Godell v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Oregon Mutual Fire Insurance v. MathisOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Conn OrganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API