Legal Opinion

People v. Cummerford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1885PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to the Necorder’s Court of Detroit. (Swift, J.) Complaint for keeping saloon open on Sunday, P.p.ftnnn rl - ent brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of not keeping his saloon closed on the night of the 30th of January, 1885, from and after the hour of ten o’clock in the evening until six o’clock in the morning of the succeeding day. Before the jury were impaneled in the Becordér’s Court of the city of Detroit, where the case was tried, the defendant, by his counsel, moved to quash the complaint, on the ground that it did not set forth any offense under the laws of this State, which motion was denied, and exception taken. John Spillane, an officer of the Metropolitan police, testified that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kurtz v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. People v. WaldvogelMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. People v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Betts v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. People v. CoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. State v. DonaldsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  4. People v. TolmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Lingelbach v. HobsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API