Legal Opinion

Riley v. Ayer & Lord Tie. Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1927No. 26586PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holden, P. «L,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Ayer & Lord Tie Company, a corporation operating a creosoting plant, enjoined the state auditor from the collection of the privilege tax imposed against it for the privilege of carrying on the business of a creosoting plant in this state, under sections 77, 79, chapter 118, Laws of 1926. Section 77 of the act imposing the tax' reads as follows:

“Creosoting Plants. — Each creosoting plant operated in this state shall pay a privilege tax or occupation fee for running their business of twenty-five cents (25c) per thousand upon each thousand…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Adams v. Standard Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State ex rel. Bonsteel v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mississippi Bd. of Nursing v. BelkMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Mayor of Vicksburg v. Streckfus SteamersMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hudson v. StuartMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State Ex Rel. Rice v. Evans-Terry Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Sharpe v. Standard Oil CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API