Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Stuart

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1933No. 30434PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Appellee is a farmer and an operator of a commercial truck. He lives on and works his small farm, but utilizes all his spare time in hauling pine stumps, pine knots, and other pine light wood to' the reduction plants in the city of Hattiesburg-, and also in hauling cross-ties, pine poles, piling, etc., to a creosoting plant located in the same city. In doing so, he uses the public highways, and often for trips exceeding twenty-five miles. He operates a track with, a two-wheel semitrailer, and habitually carries a load of approximately six tons. He does not confine himself to carrying his own…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. State ex rel. Wisconsin Allied Truck Owners Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Kellaher v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Wilby v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Farrish Gravel Company, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Branaman v. Long Beach Water Mgmt. Dist.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Rice v. Evans-Terry Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State Ex Rel. v. City Bus Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Branaman v. Long Beach Water Mgmt. Dist.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API