Clarke v. Mohr
California Supreme Court
MOTIOUS to dismiss appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. .
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Motions to dismiss the appeals. The plaintiff commenced this action to recover judgment in her favor upon a promissory note executed by the defendant, Kate C. B3nne, and for its payment out of the sale of a certain security given therefor, and also for determining the rights of the other defendants in the proceeds of said sale. Mrs. Byrne filed an answer to this complaint den3dng its several allegations. Complaints in intervention were thereafter filed by H. I. Kowalsky and by Timothy Hurley, and to these complaints answers were filed by the plaintiff and by Mrs. Byrne. The cause was tried by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Wheeler v. FarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by16 opinions
- Johnson v. Phenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Jarman v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Peck v. AgnewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Sucesión Igaravídez v. Rubert HermanosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1915
- American Surety Co. of New York v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.