Peck v. Agnew
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County. J. H. Logan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
—This action was commenced in the superior court December 12, 3895, against a number of defendants, by the plaintiff, as special administratrix of the estate of Martina Castro Depeaux, deceased, for the purpose of having it declared that they have no interest in or title to the land described in the complaint, and that it belonged to the estate of her intestate, and that she recover possession thereof. It .does not appear from the record, except inferentially, whether a summons was ever issued upon the complaint, or that it was ever served upon either of the defendants; but within ten days…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Clarke v. MohrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by7 opinions
- Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Watson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- McKenzie v. City of Thousand OaksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Siskiyou County Bank v. HoytCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.