Legal Opinion
Mayo v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 9, 1993No. C-3-88-618PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*578DECISION AND ENTRY GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CERTIFY THE CLASS (DOC. # 41); DECISION AND ENTRY ESTABLISHING SUBCLASSES AND IDENTIFYING CLASS PERIOD; CERTAIN DISCOVERY ALLOWED; CONFERENCE CALL SET TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES REGARDING NOTICE TO THE CLASS, TRIAL DATE AND PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES.
RICE, District Judge.
The captioned cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion to certify the action as a class action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a), 23(b)(2) and 23(b)(3). Doc. #41. As a point of departure, the Court reviews the complaint’s substantive…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 451, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,741 John Senter, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Hamilton v. Ohio Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Cope v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Hamilton v. Ohio Sav. BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Bentley v. Honeywell International Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
- McGee v. East Ohio Gas Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.