Legal Opinion

Peth v. Martin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1903No. 4395PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Skagit County. — Hon. Geobge A. Joineb, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Mount, J.

— This is an action to restrain the organization of a union or graded school for school districts Nos. 4 and 15 in Skagit county. It was alleged in the complaint that the petition fpr the union of these districts, which was acted upon hy the hoard of directors of district No. 4, was not sufficient, and also that no notice, as required hy law, was given of the election, and for other reasons. It will he unnecessary to notice the other reasons, or the assignments of error based thereon. On a trial in the lower court judgment was rendered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dartmouth Savings Bank v. School Districts 6Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1889
  2. Rayfield v. People ex rel. McElvainIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Fractional School-District No. One v. MetcalfMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. School Dist. No. 44, Caddo Co. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  2. Stimson Timber Co. v. Mason CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Regan v. School District No. 25Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Of School District No. 112 v. LinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Knockfierna LLC v. City of SheltonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API