Legal Opinion

Fractional School-District No. One v. Metcalf

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Certiorari to review proceedings had to detach certain territory from that of petitioner. The facts are stated in opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

This is certiorari to review proceedings had to detach certain territory from fractional school-district No. 1, composed of parts of Tittabawassee, Koch-ville, and Frankenlust townships.

The proceedings originated with a petition of 11 freeholders of the township of Frankenlust, who prayed for the detachment of the territory from school-district No. 1, composed as aforesaid, and the annexation of said territory to fractional district No. 3, composed of territory in Frank■enlust and Monitor townships. The notice by the clerk of Frankenlust township to the inspectors set forth the desire of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gentle v. Board of School InspectorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peth v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API