Legal Opinion

Matis v. Yelasich

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1956No. 18,761PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKendall, J.

Action by appellant to have appellee determined to be the father of her child, born out of wedlock, and to provide for the expenses and care as provided by statute.

Trial by court resulting in finding in favor of appellee in that he was not the father of such illegitimate child.

Motion for new trial contended that (1) the decision was not sustained by sufficient evidence and was contrary to law; (2) abuse of discretion of the trial court in preventing appellant from having a fair trial; (3) newly discovered evidence; (4) error of law occurring at the trial.

Specifications two and four are not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Koeneman v. AldridgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. State Ex Rel. Davis v. Achor, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Cobler, Admr. v. Prudential Life Ins. Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Linton-Summit Coal Co. v. HutchisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Newton v. CecilIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Beaman v. HedrickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Ligon Specialized Hauler, Inc. v. HottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Beyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. New York Central Railroad Co. v. SarichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Mikesell v. MikesellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API