Legal Opinion

Joseph v. Hustad Corporation

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1969No. 11426PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bonner

The respondent herein, Eddy Joseph, brought this action in the district court to recover damages for a breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment contained in a lease between himself and appellant herein, Hustad Corporation. The jury returned a verdict for the respondent Joseph and assessed damages in his favor in the sum of $18,500. From that award the appellant Hustad appeals.

September 25, 1964, Joseph and Hustad entered into a written lease whereby Joseph leased from Hustad for the period December 1, 1964, to November 30, 1974, a restaurant building 66 feet by 66 feet commonly known in Helena…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morton v. MooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Escallier v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Morris v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  4. Batchoff v. CraneyMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Campeau v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sewell v. GregoryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Pollock v. MorelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Northern Terminals, Inc. v. Smith Grocery & Variety, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  4. Clayton v. Clayton Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Logan v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API