Legal Opinion

Renault, Inc. v. Marble

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided April 26, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 6771PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, District Judge.

The action herein is the aftermath of the sale by the defendants, Preston W. Marble, et al., of the corporate stock of Motor Imports Corporation, to the plaintiff, Renault, Inc., for a total purchase price of $120,000.00. Plaintiff seeks reimbursement for state and federal income taxes paid by the corporation soon after the sale. These taxes were for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1959; the stock was sold on June 9, 1959. Plaintiff claims that the defendants are liable for these taxes by reason of a warranty and indemnity agreement signed at the time of the closing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Verhagen v. PlattSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  2. Helvering v. Wheeling Mold & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  3. In Re W. J. Marshall Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1924
  4. Yadusky v. ShugarsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Dingle v. CampWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Renault, Inc. v. MarbleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  2. Renault, Inc. v. MarbleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API