Legal Opinion

Dingle v. Camp

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1922No. 17228PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

In August, 1919, appellants, being then the owners or in control of all of the capital stock of *394the Endicott Hardware Company, a corporation, entered into a contract to sell all of snch stock to respondents. A written agreement evidencing* the terms of the sale was executed, which, among other things, provides that the vendors guarantee that the bills and accounts receivable of the corporation amount to $56,059.05; “that the indebtedness of said corporation in the nature of bills payable and accounts payable, or in any other way, does not exceed the full sum of $40,704.39, and are accurate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dollar Savings Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. United States v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Bronson v. SyversonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Pacific Power, & Light Co. v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc. v. George P. Mitchell, George P. Mitchell v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Verhagen v. PlattSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  3. Barrington v. MurryWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Yadusky v. ShugarsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. State v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API