Legal Opinion

Renault, Inc. v. Marble

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 10, 1963No. 7113PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PICKETT, Circuit Judge.

This action arose out of the sale of all of the capital stock of Motor Imports Corporation, a Colorado corporation, by the appellee-defendants (Marble Group) to the appellant-plaintiff, Renault, Inc. (Renault). Renault, in its complaint, alleges that the Marble Group agreed in writing to indemnify it against any loss or expense which might be incurred if a balance sheet of May 31, 1959 did not accurately reflect the financial condition of Motor Imports, Inc. on that date. It is further alleged that the balance sheet did not include as a liability of the corporation the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Mayflower Gold Mining & Reduction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Uinta Tunnel, Min. & Transp. Co. v. Ajax Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. United States v. Irene Essley, Irene Essley, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  4. Adams v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  5. Victory Inv. Corp. v. Muskogee Electric Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Skeen v. Chase Manhattan Bank (In Re American Cable Publications, Inc.)District Court, D. Colorado · 1986
  2. Renault, Inc. v. MarbleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API