Legal Opinion

United States v. David William Scott

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 27, 2005No. 05-11843PublishedCited by 303 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Opinion of the Court

HULL, Circuit Judge:

David William Scott appeals his 135-month sentence imposed after pleading guilty to: (1) use of an interstate facility to entice a minor for the purpose of sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b); (2) traveling in interstate commerce to engage in a sexual act with a person under the age of 18, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b); and (3) crossing a state line with intent to engage in a sexual act with a person under the age of 12, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2241(c). On appeal, Scott argues that the imposition of a sentence of 135 months’ imprisonment, at the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. Charles Crawford, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Scott A. WiningearCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. EggersdorfCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Remys RoblesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by303 opinions

  1. United States v. IreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. John Kevin TalleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Lydia CooperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Karl CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

298 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API