Legal Opinion
United States v. Eggersdorf
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 4, 1997No. 96-4245PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Carl Eggersdorf (Defendant) pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute at least 10 plants. At the time of Defendant’s sentencing, the pertinent sentencing guideline provided that one marijuana plant was equivalent to one kilogram of marijuana, when fifty or more plants were involved. See U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(e), n.* (November 1, 1990). The number of plants seized from Defendant was disputed; but for sentencing purposes, Defendant and the government agreed that Defendant would be held accountable for “more than 100 but less than 400.” Defendant’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. LaBonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Neal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. George Labonte, United States of America v. David E. Piper, United States of America v. Alfred Lawrence Hunnewell, Stephen Dyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Ramon J. VazquezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Edwards v. Prime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. David William ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Andrea Gogel v. KIA Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Jason M. MoriartyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. KaleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.