Legal Opinion

Wells v. Village of East Aurora

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 11, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The breach of the contract for which the plaintiff seeks damages is the “ neglect and refusal ” of the defendant village to submit to the village taxpayers a proposal for a gravity water system according to the terms of a contract between the parties. The Village Law by section 221 (as amd. by Laws of 1927, chap. 650) provides that the board of trustees of any village may by resolution adopted at a regular meeting determine upon a system of water works for supplying the village and its inhabitants with water and further provides that such action shall be subject to a permissive referendum.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parfitt v. . FurgusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Belden v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Parfitt v. FergusonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atlantic Beach Property Owners' Ass'n v. Town of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Hartford Insurance Group v. Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Potts v. Village of HaverstrawCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  4. Hartford Insurance Group v. Town of North HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Church v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API