Legal Opinion
Hartford Insurance Group v. Town of North Hempstead
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John S. Lockman, J.
Motion by plaintiff for an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 (b) dismissing the defendant Town of North Hempstead’s second affirmative defense is denied.
Plaintiff Hartford Insurance Group alleges in its complaint that the defendant Town of North Hempstead (Town) is indebted to it in the sum of $51,863.55 pursuant to an insurance contract according to the terms of which there was a $10,000 deductible for each claim and the insurance carrier was authorized to settle claims within the deductible amounts without prior authorization from the Town. Plaintiff further…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goldstein v. Brogan Cadillac Oldsmobile Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- De Forte v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Parfitt v. . FurgusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Atlantic Beach Property Owners' Ass'n v. Town of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Wells v. Village of East AuroraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CrewsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Rice v. Cayuga-Onondaga Healthcare PlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Hartford Insurance Group v. Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986