Legal Opinion
Porter v. Woodruff
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 4, 1947No. Civil Action No. 3008Published
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
This is a motion to substitute Frank R. Creedon, Housing Expediter, as party plaintiff in place and stead of Paul A. Porter, Price Administrator.
Defendant urges that this motion should be denied on the ground that it is barred by 28 U.S.C.A. § 780.
On May 29, 1947, this court granted an order of enlargement under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 6 (b) (1), 28. U.S. C.A. following section 723c, extending plaintiff’s time to and including July 12, 1947, in which to effect substitution in all actions pending in this court in which said Paul A. Porter had appeared as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thompson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Bowers v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Porter v. MauleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- Porter v. American Distilling Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Bowles v. OhlhausenDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.