Legal Opinion
Holloway v. New York City Transit Authority
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided October 28, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rolando T. Acosta, J.
Defendant moves to dismiss plaintiff’s claims, pursuant to *750CPLR 3211 (a) (7) and 3014, for failure to state a cause of action. The pro se plaintiffs claims, prepared with the aid of a court clerk, are set forth on an endorsed complaint. Defendant’s motion requires the court to address an important question regarding the sufficiency of pleadings on endorsed complaints: “If [a] ‘cause of action’ * * * need not be stated in an indorsement pleading to the extent that it would have to be stated in a formal pleading, just how much will satisfy as an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rowell v. Gould, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Viscosi v. MerrittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Gaeta v. Home Box OfficeCivil Court of the City of New York · 1996
- Southern Boulevard Sound, Inc. v. Felix Storch, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1996
- Carcione v. RizzoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chong Yuet Li v. Clean Air Car Serv. & Parking Corp., Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County2026
- Drew v. Sylvan Learning Center Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2007