Legal Opinion

Gaeta v. Home Box Office

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided April 15, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Marcy Friedman, J.

In this action, plaintiff sues defendants Home Box Office, Division of Time-Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. (HBO) and Spencer Tunick for damages arising out of an HBO broadcast. The endorsed complaint alleges a claim for violation of plaintiff’s right to privacy under Civil Rights Law §§50 and 51, and a separate claim for defamation. Defendants move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The relevant facts are not in dispute: HBO telecast a program called "ReakSex” in which plaintiff’s picture was used. The program consisted of five segments…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Howell v. New York Post Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Arrington v. New York Times Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Gautier v. Pro-Football, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Stephano v. News Group Publications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Gaeta v. New York News Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Soul Train Holdings LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Holloway v. New York City Transit AuthorityCivil Court of the City of New York · 1999
  3. Drew v. Sylvan Learning Center Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2007
  4. Messina v. LippmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
  5. Messina v. LippmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API