Legal Opinion

Carcione v. Rizzo

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 7, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order modified to the extent of denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment on condition that plaintiff serve and file a formal amended complaint within 30 days of the date of the order hereon, as so modified affirmed without costs.

The pro se indorsed pleadings dated May 30, 1991 state that plaintiff is suing in the amount of $24,750 for "Return of fees and rentals paid for illegal rental of apartment at 61-11 70 St., Middle Village, and expenses incurred”.

Both sides moved for summary judgment and the court granted defendant’s application and denied…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Park West Management Corp. v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aponte v. SantiagoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1995
  2. Southern Boulevard Sound, Inc. v. Felix Storch, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1995
  3. Hall v. BurroughsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1993
  4. Holloway v. New York City Transit AuthorityCivil Court of the City of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API