Legal Opinion

Hulme v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 3, 1939No. 27388PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

This is the second appearance of this case before this court. See Mutual Benefit Health &c. Asso. v. Hulme, 57 Ga. App. 876 (197 S. E. 85), for statement of the case and’opinion. It was then held: “1. The provisions of a policy of insurance requiring the furnishing of proof of loss to the home office of the insurer within ninety days after the death of the insured from accidental means, and making a strict compliance therewith a condition precedent to recovery, are valid, and the beneficiary is bound thereby unless the circumstances are such as to excuse a delay in complying therewith. 2. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hall v. General Accident Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  2. Life Insurance Co. of Virginia v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. North American Accident Insurance v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Pilgrim Health & Life Insurance v. ChismCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance v. CumbaaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Southern Trust Insurance v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Buffalo Insurance Co. v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Earlywine v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. LIFE &C. INS. CO. OF TENNESSEE v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API