Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Rucker

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 27, 1935No. 24097PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

Ernest Rucker, at the date of his death, was the holder of a contract of accident insurance issued by the defendant, Continental Casualty Company. The plaintiff was the beneficiary designated therein. This policy provided, among other things, the following: “‘Injury’ as used in this policy means bodily injury which is 'the sole cause of the loss and which is effected solely through accidental means while this policy is in force.” The jury found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant excepts to the overruling of its motion for a new trial.

We will first consider the general…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bohaker v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Atlanta Accident Ass'n v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Fulton v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Cobb v. Preferred Mutual Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. PittmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Johnson v. National Life & Accident Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. Green v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  4. Life Insurance Co. v. DodgenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Pippin v. Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API