Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sharma v. State

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1983No. 8686PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*633OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 171-3 vests the management, administration, and control of the public lands of the State of Hawaii in the Department of Land and Natural Resources (the department).1 Must the department’s executive board, the Board of Land and Natural Resources (the Board), acting on behalf of the State as the lessor of land, follow the directives of HRS Chapter 91, the Hawaii Administrative Procedure Act (HAPA), in cancelling a lease? Plaintiff-appellant Mahendra Rudra Sharma (Sharma or the plaintiff) contends the Board was obligated to do so…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Adderley v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Smith v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Aguiar v. Hawaii Housing AuthorityHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Town v. Land Use CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Hui Kako'o Aina Ho'opulapula v. Board of Land & Natural ResourcesHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In re the Tax Appeal of Trade Wind Tours of Hawaii, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Hui Kako'o Aina Ho'opulapula v. Board of Land & Natural ResourcesHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Hui Kako'o Aina Ho'opulapula v. Board of Land & Natural ResourcesHawaii Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API