Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hui Kako'o Aina Ho'opulapula v. Board of Land & Natural Resources

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 2006No. 27159Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

ACOBA, J.,

with whom DEL ROSARIO, J., Joins.

In this case, the majority decides as to the appeal of Appellant-Appellant Hui Kako'o Aina Ho'opulapula (Hui Kako'o) that “no” *43does not mean no, even in the face of an administrative rule that clearly does not provide for “reconsideration” of a denial. The effect of this approach is unjust, inasmuch as, based on the plain language of Hawai'i Administrative Rule (HAR) § 13-1-29,1 Hui Kako'o could not have had adequate notice that to preserve its right to judicial review under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) §…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. 12 Collier bankr.cas.2d 899, Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,345 in Re Teltronics Services, Inc., Debtor. Anaconda-Ericsson Inc., as Successor by Merger to Lm Ericsson Telecommunications, Inc. v. Jules J. Hessen, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Teltronics Services, Inc., Michael M. Rand and Gregory T. Frese, Teltronics Services, Inc., and Edward M. Beagan v. Anaconda-Ericsson Inc., Lm Ericsson Telephone Company, and Ericsson Telecomm, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Coon v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hofsommer v. Hofsommer Excavating, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Public Access Shoreline Hawaii ex rel. Rothstein v. Hawai'i County Planning Commission ex rel. FujimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Pele Defense Fund v. Puna Geothermal VentureHawaii Supreme Court · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API