Legal Opinion
Matter of the United Corporation. Joseph B. Hyman, in No. 12151, Randolph Phillips, in Nos. 12157, 12158
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 3, 1957No. 12151, 12157, 12158PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
These appeals are from an Order 1 of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware approving and enforcing an Order 2 of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) relating to claims for fees and expenses for services rendered in connection with two reorganization plans — the 1944 Ex change Plan and the Investment Company Plan — filed by The United Corporation (“United”) pursuant to § 11(e) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (“the Act”). 3
The broad issue presented is whether the District Court erred in its determination, with…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Charlton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Rockwell Manufacturing Company (Du Bois Division)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Northern Virginia Steel Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- W. J. Dillner Transfer Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.