Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Hamilton

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1943No. Civ. No. 14072PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants, predicated upon the sustaining of a demurrer to their complaint without leave to amend, in an equitable action to set aside a sale of real property pursuant to a writ of execution issued upon a decree foreclosing a deed of trust.

They also urge that it was error for the trial court to refuse them leave to file a proposed amended complaint.

The essential allegations of the complaint and proposed amended complaint which are well pleaded* are that:(a) Plaintiffs executed a trust deed as security for a promissory note payable to defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Humboldt Sav. Bank v. McClevertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Touli v. Santa Cruz County Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Leonard v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Hamilton v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Williams v. KoenigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Karlsen v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Carpenter v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API