Carpenter v. Hamilton
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants, predicated upon the sustaining of a demurrer to their complaint without leave to amend, in an equitable action to set aside a sale of real property pursuant to a writ of execution issued upon a decree foreclosing a deed of trust.
They also urge that it was error for the trial court to refuse them leave to file a proposed amended complaint.
The essential allegations of the complaint and proposed amended complaint which are well pleaded* are that:(a) Plaintiffs executed a trust deed as security for a promissory note payable to defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Humboldt Sav. Bank v. McClevertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Touli v. Santa Cruz County Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Leonard v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Hamilton v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Williams v. KoenigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Karlsen v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Carpenter v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946