Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. Doyle

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 2006No. 2003AP421Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPatience Drake Roggensack, J.

¶ 285. {concurring in part and dissenting in pari). Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. (Dairyland) appeals summary judgment dismissing its complaint, which judgment the circuit court rendered in 2001. Dairyland's complaint involved the 1991-92 and the 1998-99 Indian gaming compacts. The majority opinion concludes that the games added to the compacts in 2003 do not violate Wisconsin law. Majority op., ¶ 91. However, the 2003 gaming compacts were never presented to the circuit court and therefore, they are not properly brought before this court as we review the circuit court decision. All that we…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API