Legal Opinion

Maul v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 11, 1935No. 8713PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Forty-Fifth district court of Bexar county, denying the probate of an alleged holographic will of Mrs. Margaret E. Voigt, deceased. C. F. Maul was the proponent of the alleged will, which was contested by Mrs. Margaret E. Williams and Mrs. Gladys D. Rice, mother and half-sister, respectively, of the deceased Mrs. Voigt.

The alleged holographic will was composed of four different instruments: One dated December 19, 1926, another December 20, 1926, another not dated, and another , dated December 7, 1926.

This cause has been before this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scott v. TownsendTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Scott v. TownsendTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Russell v. BoylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Maul v. WilliamsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  5. Morris v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lowery v. Saunders, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  2. Price v. TaliaferroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Kirkpatrick v. RaggioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Kramer v. CroutCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Jones v. SelmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API