Legal Opinion

Russell v. Boyles

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 18, 1930No. 7459PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaugh, J.

This action is a will contest. Mrs. S. E. Russell devised all of her property to her four daughters, and left nothing to her four sons, contestants of her will in the trial court, and appellants here. The grounds of the contest were, first, that testatrix was of unsound mind at the time she executed her will; and, second, that she was induced by undue influence of the beneficiaries to disinherit her sons. Only the issue of mental soundness was submitted to the jury, on which the jury found against appellants. The court thereupon entered judgment against the contestants.

The first proposition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Craycroft v. CrawfordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Magee v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Curry v. CurryTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Truelove v. TrueloveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Pullen v. RussCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Barksdale v. DobbinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Moos v. First State Bank of UvaldeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API