Legal Opinion

Maul v. Williams

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1934No. 1748—6214PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRITZ, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of the district court of Bexar county, Tex., denying application to probate a certain instrument in writing purporting to be the last will and testament of Margaret Voigt, deceased. The case was tried in the district court with C. F. Maul, plaintiff in error here, as proponent of the alleged will, and Margaret E. Williams et al., defendants in error here, as contestants. Maul appealed from the judgment of the district court to the Court of Civil Appeals at San Antonio. When the case was finally heard in that court, it dismissed the cause,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Noyes v. GerardMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Baker v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Heirs of McMichael v. BankstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1872
  4. In re Voigt's EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kirk v. HeadTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. In Re the Estate of Capps, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  3. In Re the Estate of TeubertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Price v. TaliaferroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Gunn v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API