Legal Opinion · Dissent

Houston v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 2008No. 05CV2681CC; A129815Published

1DissentWollheim, J.

The majority opinion dismisses this case as moot. For the reasons that follow, I respectfully disagree and would affirm the trial court.

In Brumnett v. PSRB, 315 Or 402,405,848 P2d 1194 (1993), the Supreme Court stated that “[determining mootness is one part of the broader question of whether a justiciable controversy exist[s.]” In order for a matter to be a justiciable controversy, a decision in the matter has to “have some practical effect on the rights of the parties to the controversy.” Id.; see also Corey v. DLCD, 344 Or 457, 464, 184 P3d 1109 (2008) (“If it becomes clear in the course of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. LangdonOregon Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API