Houston v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentWollheim, J.
The majority opinion dismisses this case as moot. For the reasons that follow, I respectfully disagree and would affirm the trial court.
In Brumnett v. PSRB, 315 Or 402,405,848 P2d 1194 (1993), the Supreme Court stated that “[determining mootness is one part of the broader question of whether a justiciable controversy exist[s.]” In order for a matter to be a justiciable controversy, a decision in the matter has to “have some practical effect on the rights of the parties to the controversy.” Id.; see also Corey v. DLCD, 344 Or 457, 464, 184 P3d 1109 (2008) (“If it becomes clear in the course of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. LangdonOregon Supreme Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.