Legal Opinion

Thiel v. Nelson

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 24, 2006No. 05-C-715CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

CRABB, District Judge.

These are civil actions for injunctive and declaratory relief in which plaintiffs Dennis Thiel and Steve Burgess challenge a smoking ban enacted recently at the Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center in Mauston, Wisconsin. Plaintiffs are involuntarily committed at Sand Ridge pursuant to Wisconsin’s sexually violent persons statute, Wis. Stat. ch. 980. On December 7, 2005, defendants Helen Nelson and Steve Watters removed the actions to this court from the Circuit Court for Dane County, asserting jurisdiction under the federal question statute, 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Piekosz-Murphy v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  2. Curious Theater Co. v. Colorado Department of Public Health & EnvironmentColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Giordano v. Connecticut Valley HospitalDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
  4. Grages v. Geisinger HealthDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Mushi v. L.J. Ross Associates, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API