Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Melling v. Gordon

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 6, 1925No. 1727PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, awarding priority of invention to appellees, Gordon and Redlin. The issue is in 3 counts, described in the opinion of the Examiner in Chief as follows:

“The subject-matter of the interference is a lathe for turning irregular forms, specifically the cam shafts of automobile engines. In the embodiment of invention disclosed in. the Melling application involved in interference, the cutter is carried by a swinging lever mounted on a reciprocating carriage, movable in a plant transverse to the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jim Dandy Co. ex rel. Western Grain Co. v. Martha White Foods, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  2. Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De RooCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  3. Gordon Form Lathe Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Gordon Form Lathe Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  5. Melling v. Gordon Form Lathe Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API