Legal Opinion

Cole v. Plummer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1983No. WD 34319PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, Judge.

This is a civil action for the recovery of damages for personal injuries. The judgment was entered upon the jury’s verdict for defendant (Plummer). The judgment is affirmed.

Two points are presented, which in summary charge that the trial court erred in (1) the submission of respondent’s converse instructions to appellants’ verdict-directing instructions, and (2) overruling appellants’ motion for new trial because the jury’s verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

In summary, the record shows that appellant, Robert Cole, was standing in the median between eastbound and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brown v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Murphy Ex Rel. Murphy v. LandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Stanziale v. MusickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. Lifritz v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. City National Bank & Trust Co. v. GravesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mehra v. MehraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Lipton Realty, Inc. v. St. Louis Housing AuthorityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Riverside-Quindaro Bend Levee District v. Missouri American Water Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Hulsey v. SchulzeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Fields v. Mitch Crawford's Holiday Motors Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API