Legal Opinion

Brown v. St. Louis Public Service Company

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 13, 1967No. 52968PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINCH, Judge.

Plaintiff’s personal injury action resulted in a verdict in her favor for $5,000. Defendant’s motion for new trial contained numerous assignments of error, but the trial court granted a new trial on the single ground that

“ * * * the word ‘direct’ before the word ‘result’ in the second last line *257of MAI No. 4.01 is left out in Instruction No. 6.” The court order then stated: “Said omission of said word allowed the jury to award sums to plaintiff for damages she sustained even though they were not sustained and would not be sustained in the future as a ‘direct result of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy Ex Rel. Murphy v. LandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Pender v. FoesteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Motsinger v. Queen City Casket CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. Hunter v. NortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Johnson v. WestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Means v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  2. Johnson v. CorbetMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Murphy Ex Rel. Murphy v. LandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Javis v. Board of Education of the School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Karashin v. Haggard Hauling & Rigging, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API