Legal Opinion

Lifritz v. Sears, Roebuck and Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 1971No. 33931PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEIER, Commissioner.

Plaintiff, the purchaser of an aluminum stepladder from defendant company, fell from the ladder and sustained personal injuries. The trial court sustained defendant's motion for a new trial after a verdict and judgment awarded plaintiff the sum of $7,900.00. We reverse and remand, with instructions to reinstate the verdict and judgment.

Harold Lifritz, the plaintiff, was 45 years of age and for 22 years had been an engineer for the Norfolk & Western Railroad. Weighing 173 pounds, he stood five feet ten and one-half inches.

On August 9, 1967, Mr. Lifritz purchased a six-foot…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Keener v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Williams v. Ford Motor CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Clark v. Quality Dairy CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. Schmidt Ex Rel. Schmidt v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. Gibson Ex Rel. Gibson v. NewhouseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Jerry M. BASS; Bonnie Bass, Appellees, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  3. Thomas Polk v. Ford Motor Company, Ethel Lee Marshall, Guardian v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. Ellithorpe v. Ford Motor CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Duke v. Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API