Griffin v. Doe
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
MAE A. D’AGOSTINO, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On May 1, 2014, Plaintiff commenced this action pro se pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. See Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff asserts that unnamed medical professionals and an unnamed general at the Fort Drum U.S. Army base provided inadequate medical care to her daughter, V.G. See id. at 5-6. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant(s)’ actions violated…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Butler v. HeschDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2018
- Carroll v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025
- Harlow v. ShipeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
- Hector v. JacksonDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2025
- Latimer v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.