Legal Opinion

Dunham v. City of N.Y.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided March 13, 2018No. 11 Civ. 1223 (ALC)(HBP)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:

I. Introduction

By notice of motion dated August 18, 2017, plaintiff seeks leave to file a Third *323Amended Complaint (Plaintiff's Motion to Amend, dated Aug. 18, 2017 (Docket Item ("D.I.") 72) ("Mot."); Proposed Third Amended Complaint, dated Aug. 18, 2017 ("Proposed TAC"), attached to Mot.). For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff's motion is granted in part and denied in part.

II. Facts 1

This Section 1983 action arises from plaintiff's arrest on February 15, 2008. On the evening of February 14, 2008, the New York City Police Department ("NYPD") received…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Corley v. VanceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Charter Commc'ns, Inc. v. Local Union No. 3, Int'l Bhd. of Elec. WorkersDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Xerox Corp. v. Lantronix, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2018
  4. 7 W. 57th St. Realty Co. v. Citigroup, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Barry v. RussoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API