United States v. James Wells
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion filed on December 19, 2017, is amended as follows: on slip opinion page 66, lines 12-22, replace the following text:
“The defendant’s right to present evidence which may exonerate him, however, is not absolute and may have to ‘bow to accommodate other legitimate interests in the criminal trial process.’ ” Id. (quoting Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 296 (1973)). This type of-evidence is not admissible “if it simply affords a possible ground of suspicion against such person; rather, it must be coupled with substantial evidence tending to directly connect that person with…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Buck v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. Susan RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- State of Washington v. Bryan Jack Ross CrowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- United States v. Angelica Urias EspinozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- People of Guam v. Jesse Junior Quintanilla Pinaula (aka Jesse Quintanilla Pinaula Jr.)Supreme Court of Guam · 2025
- United States v. Alfred VelazquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.