Legal Opinion

United States v. Jesus Barragan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 8, 2017No. 13-50516, 13-50518, 13-50525, 13-50531PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HURWITZ, Circuit Judge:

Jesus Barragan, Pablo Franco, Francisco Gutierrez, and Hector Fernandez were convicted of conspiracy in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”); Barragan was also convicted of drug crimes. They appeal their convictions and sentences- Although we find a portion of the prosecutor’s closing argument improper, we conclude that prejudice has not been shown and affirm the convictions. We affirm the sentences of Barragan, Franco, and Fernandez, but vacate Gutierrez’s sentence and remand for resentencing.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Investigation…

2Cases cited96 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. United States v. Zavian JordanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Valentino JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Deljuan BankstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Javier PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Diana YatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API